|Titre :||What are the contents of patient engagement interventions for older adults? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (2018)|
|Auteurs :||Julia Menichetti, Auteur ; Guendalina Graffigna, Auteur ; Aslak Steinsbekk, Auteur|
|Type de document :||Article : texte imprimé|
|Dans :||Patient Education and Counseling (Vol. 101 n°6, Juin 2018)|
|Article en page(s) :||pp. 995-1005|
|Mots-clés:||Revue systématique ; Participation du patient|
To describe the contents of interventions reported in RCTs focusing on patient engagement of older adults.
A systematic literature review based on a search for “patient engagement/activation/empowerment/involvement/participation”. Interventions were classified according to: (i) specific components (micro level), (ii) single/multiple dimensions (educational, behavioral, affective) (meso level), and (iii) the studies’ main educational, behavioral or affective dimension (macro level).
After screening 2749 articles, 35 were included. 20 unique components were identified, mostly behavioral or educational (45.5% each) (e.g., goal setting or written informational materials). Most interventions with a single-focus were classified as educational (31%), one was solely affective (3%). Half of the interventions covered more than one dimension, with four (11%) combining all three dimensions. Studies mainly focusing on the affective dimension included older participants (72 vs. 67 years), had a higher proportion of females (71% vs. 44%), and included other dimensions more frequently (67% vs. 31%) than did studies with a main focus on the educational dimension.
The contents of the interventions that focused on patient engagement of older adults tend to focus more on behavioral and educational dimensions than the affective dimension.
The possibility of adding the affective dimension into behavioral and/or educational interventions should be explored
|RESO P.12||RE001005||Bulletin||RESOdoc||Consultation sur place|