|Titre :||Effectiveness of shared decision-making intervention in patients with lumbar degenerative diseases: A randomized controlled trial (2021)|
|Auteurs :||Chia-Hsien Chen, Auteur ; Yi-No Kang, Auteur ; Po-Yao Chiu, Auteur ; Yi-Jing Huang, Auteur|
|Type de document :||Article : texte imprimé|
|Dans :||Patient Education and Counseling (Vol. 104 n°10, October 2021)|
|Article en page(s) :||pp. 2498-2504|
To evaluate the efficacy of shared decision-making (SDM) intervention among patients with lumbar degenerative diseases (LDDs) in terms of decision self-efficacy, control preferences, SDM process, decision satisfaction, and conflict.
A total of 130 outpatients with LDDs recruited from orthopedic or rehabilitation clinics were randomly assigned to the SDM intervention (n = 67) or comparison (n = 63) groups. Patients in the intervention group received decision aids (DAs) with decision coaching and those in controlled group received standard educational materials from a health educator. The primary outcome was decision self-efficacy, and secondary outcomes were control preference, SDM process, conflict, and satisfaction.
The SDM intervention significantly improved decision self-efficacy (mean difference [MD] = 7.1, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.7–12.5, partial η2 = 0.05) and reduced conflict (MD = −7.0, 95% CI: −12.2 to −1.9, partial η2 = 0.06), especially in patients without family involvement, compared with the health education group. However, no significant between-group differences were observed in other outcomes.
SDM intervention improved SDM self-efficacy and reduced conflict in patients with LDDs.
Clinicians can integrate DAs and decision coaching in SDM conversations. SDM intervention seems to engage patients in decision-making, especially those without family involvement."
|RESO P.12||RE65682421||Bulletin||RESOdoc||Consultation sur place|