Poverty, Resource Equality

and Social Policies


Home    The Project    People    Publications    Work in Progress    Scientific Events    Collection    Links    Contact 


Publications



  Well-being, poverty and labor income taxation : theory and application to Europe and the U.S. / François Maniquet, Dirk Neumann
CORE Discussion Paper 2016/29
In a model in which agents differ in wages and preferences over labor time–consumption bundles, we study labor income tax schemes that alleviate poverty. To avoid conflict with individual well-being, we require redistribution to take place between agents on both sides of the poverty line provided they have the same labor time. This requirement is combined with efficiency and robustness properties. Maximizing the resulting social preferences under incentive compatibility constraints yields the following evaluation criterion: tax schemes should minimize the labor time required to reach the poverty line. We apply this criterion to European countries and the US.

Appendices ...

  Social ordering functions / François Maniquet
In: The Oxford handbook of well-being and public policy / M.D. Adler, Marc Fleurbaey. Oxford University Press, 2016, chap. 8

We present the Fair Social Ordering approach to policy assessment. In an economic model, a Social Ordering Function (SOF) associates each economy in the domain with a complete ranking of the allocations. We describe the main achievements of the SOF theory. We present two applications, which show how SOF's can be used to evaluate policies. The first application concerns labor income taxation. The second application concerns the measurement of poverty. Finally, we discuss the relationship between the SOF approach and some other approaches to the construction of criteria to evaluate policies.


  Does the choice of well-being measure matter empirically ? An illustration with German data / Koen Decancq, Dirk Neumann
In: The Oxford handbook of well-being and public policy / M.D. Adler, Marc Fleurbaey. Oxford University Press, 2016, chap. 19

We discuss and compare five measures of individual well-being, namely income, an objective composite well-being index, a measure of subjective well-being, equivalent income, and a well-being measure based on the von Neumann-Morgenstern utilities of the individuals. After examining the information requirements of these measures, we illustrate their implementation using data from the German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP) for 2010. We find sizeable differences in the characteristics of the individuals identified as worst off according to the different well-being measures. Less than 1% of the individuals belong to the bottom decile according to all five measures. Moreover, the measures lead to considerably different well-being rankings of the individuals. These findings highlight the importance of the choice of well-being measure for policy making.


  A new index combining the absolute and relative aspects of income poverty : theory and application / Benoit Decerf
CORE Discussion Paper 2015/50
I derive a new index combining the absolute and relative aspects of income poverty. Earning a larger income decreases one’s absolute poverty but experiencing a larger income inequality increases one’s relative poverty. Provided that the individual poverty is not computed based on the normalized income, the two aspects can be weighed such that absolutely poor individuals are always considered poorer than relatively poor individuals. Only the value of poverty aversion associated with the Poverty Gap Ratio is consistent with this approach. An application illustrates that the new index yields intuitive judgments about unequal growth experiences, for which all absolute (resp. relative) poverty indices systematically conclude that poverty has decreased (resp. increased).

  Fair social orderings with other-regarding preferences / Benoit Decerf, Martin Van der Linden
In: Social Choice and Welfare, 2015
We study the construction of social ordering functions in a multidimensional allocation problem where agents have heterogeneous other-regarding preferences (ORP). We show that there exists leximin social ordering functions satisfying equality and efficiency principles. When equality is defined as equality of resources, and ORP are only taken into account by efficiency principles, some of these social ordering functions are independent of the other-regarding part of preferences. When ORP are also taken into account by equality principles, results depend on the degree of resourcism of the social planner. If the planner still worries about equality of resources, some of the social ordering functions satisfying equality and efficiency remain independent of ORP. If the planner departs from a resourcist notion of equality, then social-ordering functions satisfying equality and efficiency must use information on the other-regarding part of preferences.

  Tax policy and income inequality in the United States, 1979–2007 / Olivier Bargain, Mathias Dolls, Herwig Immervoll, Dirk Neumann, Andreas Peichl, Nico Pestel, Sebastian Siegloch
In: Economic Inquiry, 2015
This paper assesses the effects of U.S. tax policy reforms on inequality over around three decades, from 1979 to 2007. It applies a new method for decomposing changes in government redistribution into (1) a direct policy effect resulting from policy changes and (2) the effects of changing market incomes. Over the period as a whole, the tax policy changes increased income inequality by pushing up the income share of high-income earners (the top 20%).

  Distribution of human capital and income : an empirical study on Indian States / Véronique Gille
In: Journal of Macroeconomics, 2015
Recently, an emphasis has been put on education as a key determinant for economic development. But when increasing the mean level of education of their population, developing countries face a trade-off: should they focus on increasing the level of already educated children or try to put more children into school and diminish illiteracy rates? In other words, should countries favor a more unequal or a more equal distribution of human capital? This paper empirically explores this question by analyzing the relation between distribution of education and income per capita with panel data from 29 Indian States. Using two different measures of the distribution of education and dealing with the high correlation between the mean education level and its distribution, this paper provides evidence that there is a negative relation between equality of education and income per capita. This result is robust to the use of the system GMM estimator. However, the relation is non-linear and depends on the level of development. This paper also gives a first insight into the channels which are at stake and shows that several mechanisms explain the impact of the distribution of education.

  Multidimensional poverty measurement with individual preferences / Koen Decancq, Marc Fleurbaey, François Maniquet
CORE Discussion Paper 2015/08
We propose a new class of multidimensional poverty indices. To aggregate and weight the different dimensions of poverty, we rely on the preferences of the concerned agents rather than on an arbitrary weighting scheme selected by the analyst. The Pareto principle is, therefore, satisfied among the poor. The indices add up individual measures of poverty that are computed as a convex transform of the fraction of the poverty line vector to which the agent is indifferent. The axiomatic characterization of this class is grounded on new principles of interpersonal poverty comparisons and of inequality aversion among the poor. We illustrate our approach with Russian survey data between 1995 and 2005. We find that, compared to standard poverty indices, our preference sensitive indices lead to considerable differences in the identification of the poor and in subgroup poverty comparisons.

  Optimal taxation theory and principles of fairness / Marc Fleurbaey, François Maniquet
CORE Discussion Paper 2015/05
The achievements and limitations of the classical theory of optimal labor-income taxation based on social welfare functions are now well known, although utilitarianism still dominates public economics. We review the recent interest that has arisen for broadening the normative approach and making room for fairness principles such as desert or responsibility. Fairness principles sometimes provide immediate recommendations about the relative weights to assign to various income ranges, but in general require a careful choice of utility representa- tions embodying the relevant interpersonal comparisons. The main message of this paper is that the traditional tool of welfare economics, the social welfare function framework, is flexible enough to incorporate many approaches, from egalitarianism to libertarianism.

  Un concept d’échelles d’équivalence du temps de travail pour l’évaluation de l’impôt sur le revenu / François Maniquet, Dirk Neumann
In: Revue française d'économie, 2014

Nous proposons une méthode pour évaluer la capacité des systèmes de taxation du revenu à diminuer la pauvreté, lorsque celle-ci est définie en cohérence avec une notion de niveau de vie issue de l’éthique de la responsabilité. Selon cette éthique, toutes les inégalités ne sont pas injustes. Nous supposons que les inégalités de revenu dues aux inégalités de temps de travail ne sont pas injustes. Pour résoudre le problème de la comparaison entre ménages de tailles différentes, nous introduisons un concept d’échelle d’équivalence de temps de travail. Nous appliquons la méthode à l’évaluation du système fiscal belge.

See also the Abstract (in English) :
Labor-Time Equivalence Scales and the Evaluation of Income Taxation Policies

  Social ordering functions / François Maniquet
CORE Discussion Paper 2014/51
We present the Fair Social Ordering approach to policy assessment. In an economic model, a Social Ordering Function (SOF) associates each economy in the domain with a complete ranking of the allocations. We describe the main achievements of the SOF theory. We present two applications, which show how SOF's can be used to evaluate policies. The first application concerns labor income taxation. The second application concerns the measurement of poverty. Finally, we discuss the relationship between the SOF approach and some other approaches to the construction of criteria to evaluate policies.

  Does the choice of well-being measure matter empirically ? An illustration with German data / Koen Decancq, Dirk Neumann
CORE Discussion Paper 2014/50
We discuss and compare five measures of individual well-being, namely income, an objective composite well-being index, a measure of subjective well-being, equivalent income, and a well-being measure based on the von Neumann-Morgenstern utilities of the individuals. After examining the information requirements of these measures, we illustrate their implementation using data from the German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP) for 2010. We find sizeable differences in the characteristics of the individuals identified as worst off according to the different well-being measures. Less than 1% of the individuals belong to the bottom decile according to all five measures. Moreover, the measures lead to considerably different well-being rankings of the individuals. These findings highlight the importance of the choice of well-being measure for policy making.

  Comparing inequality aversion across countries when labor supply responses differ / Olivier Bargain, Mathias Dolls, Dirk Neumann, Andreas Peichl, Sebastian Siegloch
In: International Tax and Public Finance, 2014
We analyze to which extent social inequality aversion differs across nations when controlling for actual country differences in labor supply responses. Towards this aim, we estimate labor supply elasticities at both extensive and intensive margins for 17 EU countries and the US. Using the same data, inequality aversion is measured as the degree of redistribution implicit in current tax-benefit systems, when these systems are deemed optimal. We find relatively small differences in labor supply elasticities across countries. However, this changes the cross-country ranking in inequality aversion compared to scenarios following the standard approach of using uniform elasticities. Differences in redistributive views are significant between three groups of nations. Labor supply responses are systematically larger at the extensive margin and often larger for the lowest earnings groups, exacerbating the implicit Rawlsian views for countries with traditional social assistance programs. Given the possibility that labor supply responsiveness was underestimated at the time these programs were implemented, we show that such wrong perceptions would lead to less pronounced and much more similar levels of inequality aversion.

  Income poverty measures with relative poverty lines / Benoit Decerf
CORE Discussion Paper 2014/22
I derive poverty indices taking into account both the absolute and relative aspects of income well-being. The trade-off made by the social planner between those two aspects is captured at individual level by a well-being ordering. This ordering evaluates the well-being of an agent based on her income and a reference statistic on the income distribution, typically the mean. A family of poverty indices respecting the judgements held in the ordering is axiomatically characterized. Then, I study the consequences of requiring the poverty indices to grant a minimal precedence to the absolute over the relative aspect of income well-being. This compelling requirement has strong implications. In particular, the Poverty Gap Ratio is the only index in the popular Foster-Greer-Thorbecke family to satisfy it.

  Inequality, income, and well-being / Koen Decancq, Marc Fleurbaey, Erik Schokkaert
CORE Discussion Paper 2014/18

Individual well-being depends not only on income but also on other dimensions of life, such as health, the quality of social relations and of the environment, employment, and job satisfaction. In this paper we survey the economic literature on how to construct such overall measures of well-being. We distinguish three approaches: the capability (and functionings) approach, the use of subjective life satisfaction measures and the calculation of equivalent incomes. We discuss the normative assumptions underlying these three approaches, focusing on two issues: the degree to which individual preferences are respected and where in each approach the boundaries of individual responsibility are drawn. We compare the measurement of inequality in well-being with the use of multidimensional inequality measures. We illustrate the general theoretical issues in three domains of application: measuring the effects of household size and composition in the literature on equivalence scales, valuing publicly provided goods and services, and making international comparisons of well-being involving international PPP comparisons.

  Tax-benefit revealed social preferences in Europe and the US / Olivier Bargain, Mathias Dolls, Dirk Neumann, Andreas Peichl and Sebastian Siegloch
In: Annals of Economics and Statistics, 2014
We follow the inverted optimal tax approach to characterize and compare “tax-benefit revealed” social preferences in 17 EU countries and the US. Following Bargain et al. [2013], we invert the optimal income taxation model on the distributions of net and gross incomes and use labor supply elasticities consistently estimated on the same data. The present paper focuses on new outputs of particular interest for the current policy debate on in-work versus traditional social transfers. Results are as follows: We find that revealed marginal social welfare functions verify minimal consistency checks and, notably, respect Paretianity overall. An exception is due to the treatment of the working poor in countries with standard, demogrant transfers. We illustrate for some countries how the recent policy trend in Continental and Nordic Europe tends to correct this “anomaly” through redistributive reforms in favor of the working poor. Finally, we compare revealed and stated social preferences using direct survey information and suggest explanations for the apparent discrepancies.

  Pauvreté, besoins et responsabilité dans l’impôt sur le revenu en Belgique / François Maniquet, Dirk Neumann
In:
Le modèle social belge : quel avenir ? / P. Maystadt, e.a. Actes du 20e Congrès des économistes belges de langue française, 2013
L’Etat-providence est en question. Que de fois n’a-t-on pas entendu cet avertissement ! La banalité du propos n’enlève toutefois rien à la réalité du défi ! Avec ces mots, Philippe Maystadt introduit d’emblée la complexité et la profondeur de la réflexion menée autour du modèle social belge. Dans cet ouvrage, une quarantaine d'intervenants présentent leurs travaux de recherche au sein de quatre commissions : 1. Le modèle social belge: performance et équité ; 2. Le marché du travail comme composante du modèle social ; 3. La soutenabilité du modèle social belge ; 4. L'éducation et la formation dans la perspective du modèle social.

  Happy taxpayers ? Income taxation and well-being / A. Akay, O. Bargain, M. Dolls, Dirk Neumann, A. Peichl, S. Siegloch
IZA Discussion Paper 6999
This paper offers a first empirical investigation of how labor taxation (income and payroll taxes) affects individuals' well-being. For identification, we exploit exogenous variation in tax rules over time and across demographic groups using 26 years of German panel data. We find that the tax effect on subjective well-being is significant and positive when controlling for income net of taxes. This interesting result is robust to numerous specification checks. It is consistent with several possible channels through which taxes affect welfare including public goods, insurance, redistributive taste and tax morale.

  Equality of opportunity : the economics of responsability / Marc Fleurbaey, François Maniquet
World Scientific, 2012 - ISBN 9789814368872

This book is a collection of articles written by the two authors on the topic of equality of opportunity. All articles build on the idea that a just society should equalize the resources that determine the opportunities agents face in order to follow their goals. Resources are either external, like financial resources, or internal, like preferences or skills. The authors propose to define "equality of opportunity" as the combination of ethical principles of compensation and responsibility. The principle of compensation requires external resources to be used to compensate low-skilled agents (considering that inequalities due to skill differences are unjust). The principle of responsibility requires external resources to be allocated without regards to inequalities due to differences in preferences (considering that these inequalities are not unjust). The articles present different ways of combining the two principles in different economic contexts.


  A theory of fairness and social welfare / Marc Fleurbaey, François Maniquet
Cambridge University Press, 2011 - ISBN 9780521887427

The definition and measurement of social welfare have been a vexed issue for the past century. This book makes a constructive, easily applicable proposal and suggests how to evaluate the economic situation of a society in a way that gives priority to the worst-off and that respects each individual's preferences over over his or her own consumption, work, leisure, and so on. This approach resonates with the current concern to go "beyond the GDP" in the measurement of social progress. Compared to technical studies in welfare economics, this book emphasizes constructive results rather than paradoxes and impossibilities, and shows how one can start from basic principles of efficiency and fairness and end up with concrete evaluation of policies.







The PoRESP Blog

The PoRESP blog aims at providing information on scientific events, scientific papers and news on poverty related topics.

 

"Le peuple des pauvres"
Jean-François Favre, 2008