LITERATURE

Atkinson, G.F. 1909. Motions relating to the rules for the nomenclature of the fungi proposed for action at the IIIrd International Botanical Congress at Brussels, 14-22 May 1910. Ithaca, N.Y. 14 pp.

Briquet, J. 1905. Texte synoptique des documents destinés à servir de base aux débats du Congrès International de Nomenclature Botanique de Vienne 1905. Commission Internationale de Nomenclature Botanique. Friedlنnder, Berlin. 162 pp.

Briquet, J. 1912. International Rules of Botanical Nomenclature adopted by the International Botanical Congresses of Vienna, 1905 and Brussels, 1910. G. Fischer, Jena, 110 pp.

Briquet, J. 1935. International Rules of Botanical Nomenclature adopted by the International Botanical Congresses of Vienna 1905 and Brussels 1910 revised by the International Botanical Congress of Cambridge 1930. G. Fischer, Jena, 152 pp.

Buffin, N. & G.L. Hennebert, 1984. Cylindrodendrum album Bonorden a pleoanamorphic semiaquatic hyphomy­cete. Mycotaxon 19: 323-341.

Buffin, N. & G.L. Hennebert, 1985. Basifimbria spinosa, a new pleoanamorphic coprophilous hyphomycete. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Pl. Sci.) 94: 259-267.

Cannon, P.F. & P.M. Kirk, 2000. The philosophy and practicalities of amalgamating anamorph and teleo­morph concepts. Stud. Mycol. 45: 19-25.

Carmichael, J.W., 1979. Cross‑reference names for pleo­mor­phic fungi. In: Kendrick, B. (ed.): The Whole Fun­gus, vol. 1. pp. 31-41. National Museums of Canada, Ottawa.

Carmichael, J.W., W.B. Kendrick, I.L. Conners & L. Sigler, 1980. Genera of Hyphomycetes. Univ. Alberta Press, Edmonton, 386 pp.

De Candolle, A. 1867. Lois de la Nomenclature Botanique adoptée par le Congrès international de Botanique, Paris, Août 1967. Genève, 64 pp.

Donk, M.A., 1960. On nomina anamorphosium. Taxon 9: 171-174.

Donk, M.A., 1962. The generic names proposed for hymeno­mycetes--XII. Deuteromycetes. Taxon 11: 75-104.

Ellis, M.B., 1971. Dematiaceous Hyphomycetes. Common­wealth Mycol. Inst., Kew, 608 pp.

Ellis, M.B., 1976. More dematiaceous Hyphomycetes. Com­monwealth Mycol. Inst., Kew, 507 pp.

Fuckel, L., 1870. Symbolae mycologicae. Jahrb. Nassau­ischen Ver. Naturk. 23-24. Wiesbaden.

Gams, W., 1982. Generic names for synanamorphs? Myco­taxon 15: 459-464.

Greuter, W., J. McNeill, F.R. Barrie, H.M. Burdet, V. Demoulin, T.S. Filgueiras, D.H. Nicolson, P.C. Silva, J.E. Skog, P. Trehane, N.J. Turland, & D.L. Hawks­worth (Eds.) 2000. International Code of Bota­nical Nomenclature (St. Louis Code). Reg. Veget. 138, Kِnig­stein.

Hawksworth, D.L., 1993. Holomorphic fungi: the issues, the common ground and the way ahead. In Reynolds D.R. & Taylor J.W. (eds.): The fungal holomorph: mitotic, meiotic an pleomorphic speciation in fungal systematics. CAB International, pp. 57-63.

Hawksworth, D.L., 2001. Proposals to limit the future use of a dual nomenclature for pleomorphic fungi. CBS web­page <http://www.cbs.knaw.nl>

Hawksworth, D.L. & J. Mouchacca, 1994. Ascomycete systematics in the nineties, in Hawksworth D., As­comy­cete Systematics. Problems and Perspectives in the Nineties, Plenum Press, 1994, pp. 3-12.

Hawksworth, D.L., P.M. Kirk, B.C. Sutton & D.N. Peg­ler, 1995. Dictionary of the fungi. 8th ed. CAB Inter­national, Wallingford, 616 pp.

Hennebert, G.L., 1967. Chalaropsis punctulata, a new hyphomycete. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 33: 333-340.

Hennebert, G.L., 1971. Pleomorphism in Fungi Imperfecti. pp. 202-223 In: Kendrick B. (Ed.), Taxonomy of Fungi Imperfecti. Kananaskis I.

Hennebert, G.L., 1987. Pleoanamorphy and its nomencla­tural problem. pp. 263-290 In: Sugiyama J. (ed.), Pleo­morphic fungi. The diversity and its taxonomic implica­tions. Elsevier.

Hennebert, G.L., 1991. Art. 59 and the problem with pleo­anamorphic fungi. Mycotaxon 40: 479-496.

Hennebert, G.L., 1993. Towards a natural classification of the fungi. pp. 283-294 In Reynolds D.R. & Taylor J.W. (eds.), The fungal holomorph: mitotic, meiotic an pleo­morphic speciation in fungal systematics. CAB Inter­national.

Hennebert, G.L. & L.K. Weresub, 1977. Terms for states and forms of fungi, their names and types. Mycotaxon 6: 207-211.

Hِhnel, F. von, 1923. System der Fungi imperfecti Fuckel. I. Histiomyceten. II. Synnematomyceten. In: R. Falck: Mykologische Untersuchungen und Berichte 1/3: 301-369.

Hughes, S.J., 1953. Conidiophores, conidia and clas­sification. Canad. J. Bot. 31: 577-659.

Hughes, S.J., 1958. Revisiones hyphomycetum aliquot cum appendice de nominibus rejiciendis. Canad. J. Bot. 36: 737-836.

Hughes, S.J., 1979. Relocation of species of Endophragmia auct. with notes on relevant generic names. New Zealand J. Bot. 12:139-188.

Kendrick, W.B. & F. Di Cosmo, 1979. Teleomorph ana­morph connections in Ascomycetes. In: Kendrick, W.B. (ed.), The whole fungus. Vol. 1: 283-410. Natn. Mus. Nat. Sci., Canada.

Kendrick, W.B. & R. Watling, 1979. Mitospores in Basidio­mycetes. In: Kendrick, W.B. (ed.), The whole fungus. Vol. 2: 473-545. Natn. Mus. Nat. Sci., Cana­da.

Kirk, P.M., P.F. Cannon, J.C. David & J.A. Stalpers (Eds.), 2001. Dictionary of the fungi. 9th Ed. CAB Inter­national. 655 pp.

Korf, R.P. & G.L. Hennebert, 1993. A disastrous deci­sion to suppress the terms anamorph and teleomorph. Mycota­xon 48: 592-542.

Lanjouw, J. et al. (eds.) 1952. International Code of Botanical Nomenclature adopted by VIIth International Botanical Congress, Stockholm, 1950. Utrecht, 228 pp.

Lanjouw, J., S.H. Mamay, R. McVaugh, W. Robyns, R.C. Rollins, R. Ross, J. Rousseau, G.M. Schulze, R. de Vilmorin & F.A. Stafleu (eds.) 1966. International Code of Botanical Nomenclature adopted by Xth International Botanical Congress, Edinburgh, 1964. Utrecht, 402 pp.

Luttrell, E.S., 1979. Deuteromycetes and their relation­ships. In: Kendrick, B. (ed.): The Whole Fungus, vol. 1: 241-264. Natn. Mus. Nat. Sci., Canada.

Mason, E.W., 1937. Annotated account of fungi received at the Imperial Mycological Institute. List II. Fascicle 3, General Part. Mycol. Pap. 4: 69-99.

Reynolds, D.R., 1994. Implication of the Holomorph concept for ascomycete systematics. pp. 13-19 In: Hawks­worth D.L. (ed.), Ascomycete systematics: problems and perspec­tives in the Nineties. Plenum Press, London.

Reynolds, D.R. & J.W. Taylor, 1991. Nucleic acid and nomenclature: name stability under Article 59. In: Hawks­worth D.L. (ed.) Improving the stability of names: needs and options. Reg. Veget. 123: 171-177.

Reynolds, D.R. & J.W. Taylor, (eds.) 1993. The fungal holomorph: mitotic, meiotic an pleo­morphic speciation in fungal systematics. CAB Inter­national. 375 pp.

Rossman, A. Y., 2000. Towards monophyletic genera of the holomorphic Hypocreales. Stud. Mycol. 45: 27-34.

Saccardo, P.A., 1889. Sylloge fungorum VIII. Padova.

Saccardo, P.A., 1899. Sylloge fungorum XIV. Padova

Saccardo, P.A. 1904. De Diagnostica et nomenclatura mycologica, Admonita quaedam. Ann. Mycol. 2: 195-198. Engl. transl. J. Mycol. 1904: 109-114. Sylloge Fungorum 18: iii-vii, 1906.

Seifert, K.A. & G.J. Samuels, 2000. How should we look at anamorphs? Stud. Mycol. 45: 5-18.

Seifert, K.A., W. Gams, G. Morgan-Jones & W.B. Kendrick, 2003. Genera of Hyphomycetes, 2nd Ed. Centraalbureau voor Schimmel­cultures, Utrecht (in preparation).

Sutton, B.C., 1977. Coelomycetes VI. Nomenclature of generic names proposed for Coelomycetes. Mycol. Pap. 141: 1-253.

Sutton, B.C. 1980. The Coelomycetes. Commonwealth Mycol. Inst., Kew. 696 pp.

Sutton, B.C. & G.L. Hennebert. 1994. Interconnections amongst anamorphs and their possible contribution to Ascomycete systematics. pp. 77-100 In: Hawksworth D.L. (ed.), Ascomycete systematics: problems and perspectives in the Nineties. Plenum Press, London.

Tulasne, L.R. & C. Tulasne, 1851. Note sur l´appareil de réproduction dans les lichens et les champignons. Part 1 and 2. C. R. Hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci. Paris 32: 430, 470-475.

Voss, H.M., W.G. Chaloner, V. Demoulin, P. Hiepko, J. McNeill, R.D. Meikle, D.H. Nicolson, R.C. Rollins, P.C. Silva & W. Greuter (eds.) 1983. International Code of Botanical Nomenclature adopted by XIXth International Botanical Congress, Sydney, 1981. Utrecht, 472 pp.

Weresub, L.K. & G.L. Hennebert, 1979. Anamorph and teleomorph: terms for organs of reproduction rather than karyological phases. Mycotaxon 8: 181-186.

Weresub, L.K. & K.A. Pirozynski, 1979. Pleomorphism of fungi as treated in the history of mycology and nomencla­ture. In Kendrick B. (ed.) The whole fungus, vol. 1: 17-25, Natn. Mus. Nat. Sci., Canada.