{"id":47173,"date":"2023-11-22T15:11:30","date_gmt":"2023-11-22T14:11:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sites.uclouvain.be\/bkl-cbl\/?page_id=47173"},"modified":"2023-11-22T15:18:45","modified_gmt":"2023-11-22T14:18:45","slug":"heynen","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/sites.uclouvain.be\/bkl-cbl\/nl\/publicaties\/studies-van-de-bkl\/volume-16-2022\/heynen\/","title":{"rendered":"Another mixed case: Deep and surface properties of the Dutch dat doen-anaphor"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Tijdschrift<\/strong><br>Studies van de Belgische Kring voor Lingu\u00efstiek, vol. 16 (2022)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Auteur(s)<\/strong><br>Lena Heynen (KULeuven)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Abstract<\/strong><br>The Dutch VP-anaphor <em>dat doen<\/em> \u2018do that\u2019 (henceforth the DDA) has properties of both a deep and a surface anaphor, according to the distinction made by Hankamer and Sag (1976). Most types of subextraction are disallowed out of the DDA, suggesting that it is a deep anaphor. However, unaccusative and comparative movement is allowed out of the DDA, suggesting it is a surface anaphor. The DDA is thus one of the many examples of anaphors that do not neatly fall into the distinction by Hankamer and Sag (1976).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>DOI<\/strong><br><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.61430\/HRDA2832\n\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.61430\/HRDA2832<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-buttons has-custom-font-size has-small-font-size is-layout-flex wp-block-buttons-is-layout-flex\" style=\"font-style:normal;font-weight:500;text-transform:none\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-button\"><a class=\"wp-block-button__link wp-element-button\" href=\"https:\/\/sites.uclouvain.be\/bkl-cbl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/HEY_final_versionbibinfo.pdf\" style=\"border-radius:13px\">Volledige tekst bekijken<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>TijdschriftStudies van de Belgische Kring voor Lingu\u00efstiek, vol. 16 (2022) Auteur(s)Lena Heynen (KULeuven) AbstractThe Dutch VP-anaphor dat doen \u2018do that\u2019 (henceforth the DDA) has properties &hellip; <a title=\"Another mixed case: Deep and surface properties of the Dutch dat doen-anaphor\" class=\"bnm-read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/sites.uclouvain.be\/bkl-cbl\/nl\/publicaties\/studies-van-de-bkl\/volume-16-2022\/heynen\/\"><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Another mixed case: Deep and surface properties of the Dutch dat doen-anaphor<\/span>Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":123,"featured_media":0,"parent":39363,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-47173","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry","bnm-entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.uclouvain.be\/bkl-cbl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/47173","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.uclouvain.be\/bkl-cbl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.uclouvain.be\/bkl-cbl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.uclouvain.be\/bkl-cbl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/123"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.uclouvain.be\/bkl-cbl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=47173"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/sites.uclouvain.be\/bkl-cbl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/47173\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":47263,"href":"https:\/\/sites.uclouvain.be\/bkl-cbl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/47173\/revisions\/47263"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.uclouvain.be\/bkl-cbl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/39363"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.uclouvain.be\/bkl-cbl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=47173"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}