6.00 credits
45.0 h
Q1
Teacher(s)
Delforge Catherine; Léonard Thierry (coordinator);
Language
French
Prerequisites
The prerequisite(s) for this Teaching Unit (Unité d’enseignement – UE) for the programmes/courses that offer this Teaching Unit are specified at the end of this sheet.
Learning outcomes
At the end of this learning unit, the student is able to : | |
| This course provides a general background in commercial law. The main objectives are the understanding and mastery of the concepts (especially through their comparison), their application to concrete situations, and the development of a critical mind. |
|
Content
This course is structured around the following subjects:
I. General theory (Th. Léonard)
II. Introduction to corporate law (Th. Léonard)
III. Introduction to european competition law (Th. Léonard)
IV. Trade practices and consumer protection (Th. Léonard)
I. General theory (Th. Léonard)
II. Introduction to corporate law (Th. Léonard)
III. Introduction to european competition law (Th. Léonard)
IV. Trade practices and consumer protection (Th. Léonard)
Teaching methods
Lecture
Although the lecture is based on the Manuel de droit de l’entreprise (Anthemis, 2019), the structure adopted in class is not necessarily identical.
Although the lecture is based on the Manuel de droit de l’entreprise (Anthemis, 2019), the structure adopted in class is not necessarily identical.
Evaluation methods
I. Material subject to evaluation
Unless otherwise specified by the professor, the assessment will focus on:
- the subject matter covered during the lectures
- the documents analysed in class
Naturally the assessment covers the subject matter taught during the academic year in which the examination takes place.
It is important to draw the students' attention to the difficulty and level of requirement of the course. The course material is abundant and requires a "vertical" as well as "transverse" and reflective study. This difficulty can be overcome by means of attendance to lectures, regular study of the course material and, if necessary, addressing the teachers if certain points remain unclear.
II. Assessment methods
An oral examination is organized in january and september. Normaly in « face-to-face » but it could be online if required by the health situation.
It can include questions of knowledge, reflection, the application of theoretical principles to concrete situations.
Each teacher will evaluate students on the subjects he has personally taught.
The main evaluation criteria are:
1) the adequacy of the answer in regards to the question as it is formulated;
2) the understanding and accurate formulation of the applicable rules of law;
3) the rigor, clarity and precision in the formulation and explanation of the answers;
4) the ability to comprehend in a reflective and critical manner the legal issues that are submitted.
III. Authorised documents and references
During the entire examination, the students may have at their disposal:
- their code(s)
Students are however not allowed to bring codes that include summaries of jurisprudence.
- additional legislation and regulations relating to the studied subject matter
- if the exanimation is « face-to-face », the decisions of jurisprudence, providing, however, that the students are in possession of the complete/original versions (excluding the excerpts and summaries of jurisprudence).
The authorised documents in accordance with the rules mentioned above, may:
• be underlined or highlighted (fluorescent)
• include a reference to a law or regulation and/or to a decision of jurisprudence (in this case, only the seized court and the decision date are authorised, nothing more)
• Mention a keyword or group of keywords used for classification purposes, to facilitate the search of the relevant legal or statutory provisions (such as the code title or title of a special law studied during the course).
No reference in terms of content material or structure of the course is allowed.
Any non-compliance with the instructions mentioned here above will be brought to the attention of the President of the Jury (see spec. article 28 of the General Examination Regulations). It is the responsibility of each student to personally ensure compliance with these instructions.
IV. Students entitled to exemptions
Are only taken into account the exemptions officially recognised by the Faculty (by the CEVA Commission that reports to the juries): no unofficial exemption will therefore be given by the professors whatever the circumstances or marks previously obtained by the student.
Students who were formally exempted from part of the subject matter are invited to:
- Check with teachers at the beginning of the term, the dates/times at which the subjects that remain on their particular programme will be given;
- Send an email to the teachers no later than two days before the exam date so that special arrangements can be made for the evaluation;
- On the day of the exam, bring a copy of the official exemption document.
Unless otherwise specified by the professor, the assessment will focus on:
- the subject matter covered during the lectures
- the documents analysed in class
Naturally the assessment covers the subject matter taught during the academic year in which the examination takes place.
It is important to draw the students' attention to the difficulty and level of requirement of the course. The course material is abundant and requires a "vertical" as well as "transverse" and reflective study. This difficulty can be overcome by means of attendance to lectures, regular study of the course material and, if necessary, addressing the teachers if certain points remain unclear.
II. Assessment methods
An oral examination is organized in january and september. Normaly in « face-to-face » but it could be online if required by the health situation.
It can include questions of knowledge, reflection, the application of theoretical principles to concrete situations.
Each teacher will evaluate students on the subjects he has personally taught.
The main evaluation criteria are:
1) the adequacy of the answer in regards to the question as it is formulated;
2) the understanding and accurate formulation of the applicable rules of law;
3) the rigor, clarity and precision in the formulation and explanation of the answers;
4) the ability to comprehend in a reflective and critical manner the legal issues that are submitted.
III. Authorised documents and references
During the entire examination, the students may have at their disposal:
- their code(s)
Students are however not allowed to bring codes that include summaries of jurisprudence.
- additional legislation and regulations relating to the studied subject matter
- if the exanimation is « face-to-face », the decisions of jurisprudence, providing, however, that the students are in possession of the complete/original versions (excluding the excerpts and summaries of jurisprudence).
The authorised documents in accordance with the rules mentioned above, may:
• be underlined or highlighted (fluorescent)
• include a reference to a law or regulation and/or to a decision of jurisprudence (in this case, only the seized court and the decision date are authorised, nothing more)
• Mention a keyword or group of keywords used for classification purposes, to facilitate the search of the relevant legal or statutory provisions (such as the code title or title of a special law studied during the course).
No reference in terms of content material or structure of the course is allowed.
Any non-compliance with the instructions mentioned here above will be brought to the attention of the President of the Jury (see spec. article 28 of the General Examination Regulations). It is the responsibility of each student to personally ensure compliance with these instructions.
IV. Students entitled to exemptions
Are only taken into account the exemptions officially recognised by the Faculty (by the CEVA Commission that reports to the juries): no unofficial exemption will therefore be given by the professors whatever the circumstances or marks previously obtained by the student.
Students who were formally exempted from part of the subject matter are invited to:
- Check with teachers at the beginning of the term, the dates/times at which the subjects that remain on their particular programme will be given;
- Send an email to the teachers no later than two days before the exam date so that special arrangements can be made for the evaluation;
- On the day of the exam, bring a copy of the official exemption document.
Other information
Support:The Manuel du droit de l'entreprise (Anthemis, 2019) is the written support for the course. It completes and exemplifies the lecture course but is not the subject of specific questioning on the points covered. The teacher will specify his requirements in this regard during the lecture.
The Manual is available with a preferential price at the reprography service.
The Manual is available with a preferential price at the reprography service.
Bibliography
Une bibliographie orientative est reprise dans le Manuel du droit de l’entreprise.
Faculty or entity
DRTB
