3.00 credits
10.0 h + 35.0 h
Q2
Teacher(s)
Claeys Bouuaert Corentin; Desguin Benoît (compensates Rezsohazy René); Gofflot Françoise; Lejeune André (coordinator); Rees Jean-François; Rezsohazy René;
Language
French
Main themes
The student will be associated to a team charged to explore a broad scientific question, at the crossroads of disciplines appearing in his programme (animal and vegetal biology, ecology, chemistry,..). Each team will formulate assumptions, and after a training in information retrieval, will serach for document allowing to confirm/infirm these assumptions. Once these assumptions validated, students, by group of two, will explore current scientific knowledge underlying each assumption. Regular interviews with one of the teachers will allow the team to confront their work with the aims. Exercises of critical analysis of a scientific question, as well as of written and oral presentation will be organized. At the end of the first four-month period, each team will write a report on its work. The second four-month period will allow each team deepening the analysis of the question which will be the subject of an oral presentation.
Learning outcomes
At the end of this learning unit, the student is able to : | |
| 1 | The activity has several aims: - To learn how to analyze scientific information available on a subject and criticize the validity of this information - Integrate scientific knowledge on an interdisciplinary subject, - Learn data-processing tools for information retrieval and public presentation, To exert oral and written communication of scientific matters, - To learn how to effectively work as a team. |
Content
Each participant will be associated with a team in charge of exploring a broad scientific question, at the crossroads of the disciplines appearing in its curriculum (animal biology, plant, ecology, chemistry ..). Each team will formulate hypotheses, and after training in documentary research, will carry out document searches to validate / invalidate the validity of these hypotheses. Once the hypotheses are validated, the students will then explore the current scientific knowledge underlying each hypothesis. Regular interviews with one of the incumbents will allow the team to compare their work to the objectives. Exercises of critical analysis of a scientific question, as well as of written and oral presentation will be organized.
Teaching methods
Accompanied by a tutor they will meet each week, the participants will work as a team. Some training will be provided in computer rooms (text / documentary research).
Evaluation methods
Students submit a first written version of their work before the Easter holidays. A second version is submitted at the end of the term. A second draft is submitted at the end of the term, which is assessed in the form of a certificate for each group. Students are asked to evaluate themselves and the other members of their group. This assessment is used to create an individual mark by modulating the mark given to the group.
Teaching materials
- Guide de l'étudiant disponible sur moodle
Faculty or entity
BIOL
